• eleitl@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    There isn’t enough lithium available on this planet to power a technological civilization. No such problem with abundant sodium. Also, I’d rather not have a lithium chemistry battery powering my home, because it’s a fire hazard.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Any battery holding kilowatts of energy is a fire hazard. Pretty sure a gas furnace is a fire hazard.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      There isn’t enough lithium available on this planet to power a technological civilization.

      of course there is, and everyone is assuming lithium won’t be recycled.

      • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        As usual, the opponent of recycling things is simply “it’s too expensive”

        The ultimate failing of the future, as always, is current reliance on capitalism.

        Why recycle when you make more money by blowing up the planet and ripping out the good stuff?

        • yes_this_time@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I think a big part of it is that we are still in early innings with EVs and storage, how many have reached end of life? The volume is going to increase substantially, and that will drive recycling to be more economical