• tyler@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    No I’m asking you to explain how it’s not carbon neutral. I do not give one shit about the cost, I do not give one shit about how much the gas it produces costs (for reference the Porsche plant is at over $40 a LITER). You have stated it’s not carbon neutral. Explain how. If the machine does what it says then it is carbon neutral.

    I have an electric car, I do not care about this machine. But I do care when people claim something and have zero evidence to back it up.

    • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Dude, it’s su fucking non carbon neutral you must be trolling.

      First of all it’s a prototype, all the building cost, materials etc all have a carbon cost. The free electricity too has a carbon cost. All the money you want to theow at it, guess what? It has a carbon footprint.

      You’re just angry it’s not a miracle machine.

      • tyler@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 minutes ago

        So, once again you are incapable of explaining how it’s not carbon neutral, though you think you are. Carbon neutrality has nothing to do with development costs and construction costs are almost always dwarfed by running costs (which I literally mentioned if you would bother reading).

        You’re just angry it’s not a miracle machine.

        I’m not the one getting angry. You are making a bunch of bullshit claims and then getting mad that people don’t believe your lies.