• mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I bought one of these 64GB packs for less than $50 not even a year ago

  • HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I bought an 8G ECC RDIMM DDR4 the other day for 15 bucks cash.

    Guy around my age who “bought the wrong kind” for his laptop, and forgot about it until it was too late to return it.

    I’m gonna hold onto it a little longer, then see if I can’t make 30 or 40 bucks off it. 🤣

  • termaxima@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    My take : Prices got you down ? Keep the hardware you already have ! No one else can upgrade anyway, games requirements aren’t going up anytime soon.

    Obviously that doesn’t cover you if you don’t already have a machine, in which case I would go DDR3.

    But for those who do, does anyone upgrade anymore ? I’m on 2019 hardware and everything runs perfectly good. Oftentimes great !

    • Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Also using 2019 hardware! I dread the day something dies, though. Luckily I upgraded to 32gb of RAM the last time it was super cheap. I’m hoping this machine has another ten years in it.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sure, you can do that. You might as well be gaming on a Steam Deck though, because that’s the level of CPU you’d be limited to.

    Which is fine, I’ve got a Legion Go S, it works fine as long as you’re aware of the limitations.

    But if I want the AAA big screen shiz, I’m loading up something on my PS5.

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    DDR3 isn’t still what everyone’s using anyway?

    Huh, I guess it has been a few years since I looked in to RAM…

  • BanMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I retire PCs at the college I work at. They get stacked in the basement waiting on an inventory/recycling procedure that will never happen because we’re a satellite campus and the basement is the tomb of technology. Went down there the other day to bring a retired PC up to replace a very old lab PC that died. The HD had been removed by a colleague - fine, that’s procedure - and then I realized all the RAM had been stripped out. Dozens and dozens of PCs with nary a stick. “If you’re selling that RAM, I want in on it” I told him. He laughed nervously and said no, but wouldn’t say where it all was.

    I am not kidding, I want halfsies…

  • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Here I was thinking they were recommending a game that ran well with low RAM or something. Like WTF is Dead Dead Redemption 3?

  • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Found 16GB DDR4 from and old swap the other day. I’m protecting that stuff like it’s an investment now. But seriously, def hanging on to it just in case anything dies.

    On the look out for storage deals now. But I’m not hopeful.

  • RalfWausE@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I write this post from a Core2Quad machine with 8 GB of DDR2 RAM and a spinning harddisk… and the system feels quiet fast and nimble.

  • morto@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    some people (…) are asking “can you game on DDR3“? The answer is a shocking yes.

    “shocking”. Really?

    Browsing the internet as a third worlder always give me these eye-rolling moments. Sigh…

    • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Feels like it, but my gut feeling is “no” due to missing commas and no space before the em dash. Just a poorly written article.

    • Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Just because they’ve trained you to believe you need the latest 2nm chips (which is conveniently their highest margin product) doesn’t mean you really need them.

      • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        So personal computers of year 1999 gave their users that feeling of magic that can still be felt from media of that time, and state-of-the-art chips were being produced in fabs located not only on Taiwan, but USA, Israel, elsewhere.

        Personal computers of today don’t give any feeling of magic to most their users, you have to look for it.

        Yet considering a standard still above what you realistically need is somehow lowering your standards.

        In year 2006 they’d say about computers how many books you can fit into this or that volume of memory, or which calculations you can perform, sometimes, to give you perspective. They don’t do that now, because then you’d be depressed how many resources you are using for something more vulgar than porn.

        It’s just sad.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          For most people, computers became powerful enough around the year 2005. A machine from late in the Windows XP era could run 3D games, CAD software, edit video, communicate with the entire world through broadband internet. What abilities have PCs taken on since? So much processing power filled up by doing the same tasks less efficiently for no reason.

          • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Well CAD software has made leaps and bounds since then. Anyone who used CAD back in the day would know what an unstable clusterfuck it was and how much longer it took than now.

            A lot of software has gotten much better, including “core” Foss like Linux and FFMPEG. There is just 10x as much software that is horrible, and windows has gotten so much worse to the point that it feels like computers have made no progress when you use it.

            Also, CPUs nowadays use about the same power as they did 20 years ago but with an order of magnitude more processing power, and the idle power consumption is much much much lower. The first Core 2 Duo had a 65W TDP, the same as modern Ryzen 5. GPUs are just out of hand with power consumption because of profit-driven game companies and AI.

            • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              I will assert that, again, for most people, instead of computers remaining at the same TDP but increasing vastly in processing power, they would have been fine with the same processing power at vastly decreased TDP. Look at how long people held onto Win 7, and how long they held onto Win XP before that. Because they were fine, possibly better than the new offering, especially since you already owned it. Some time around 2012, anyone who wasn’t a power user ran out of reasons to get excited for new computers.

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I would agree, if websites and webapps wouldn’t be so bloated as they are. if the rich wouldn’t make us to downgrade out of their gluttony. but also, old technology is not that easily available. production lines have been shut down long ago, and if everyone went to the used market, nothing would be available even there anymore.

    • burrito@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      You gotta get on Alan Wake 2. I’ve been having a great time playing it. Play the first and Control before you do and you’ll see a lot of tie-ins which is pretty fun. One of the characters looks a lot like Max Payne too.

        • burrito@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Okay good! I played Control years ago and thoroughly enjoyed it. I picked it back up from the beginning a number of months back and got hooked. I had a price watch on Alan Wake 2 from a couple years ago and it finally hit my target so I got it. I figured I should play through the first Alan Wake so I played it and enjoyed it significantly more than I thought I would. Now I’m probably a quarter of the way through 2 and I’m really liking it a lot. I definitely want to check out Quantum Break also.

  • Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ddr3 was kind of the point where the technology stopped incrementing with large jumps.

    Not saying ddr3 is as good as ddr4 or 5 but I used ddr3 until 2021 with no issue.