While neither the regime nor SpaceX likes to reveal their cards, hackers and journalists are not deterred by this, and the laws of physics apply to everyone.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Good article. Very interesting.

    TL;DR: Starlink recievers use methods to make it so they don’t have to be directly positioned at satellites; this in turn leaves them vulnerable to “side lobe jamming” and GPS spoofing. The suggestion is to point them directly and cover them i.e. in a pit or in a cavity of some such so that the jamming / spoofing doesn’t reach it.

  • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    What is going to happen when countries decide that they don’t want starlink satellites over thei air space and start to blow them up?

    It would be hard to do? How much would that affect the general use of starlink for users on other parts of the world?

    • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Given that space isn’t owned by any one country, and Starlink is a US company, whose services are used by the US government, there’s a very good chance there would be military retaliation.