wiki-user: Aatube

Now mostly on @[email protected] . I use this account as a backup.

  • 8 posts
  • 69 comments
Joined 3 years ago
Cake day: June 18th, 2023
  • in the past ten years, human flesh searching most often targets those perceived to make anti-nationalist comments.

    i’ll agree that it’s questionable if it has state backing but i completely missed your claim that doxxing campaigns are the result of the government. unfortunately my honest reaction to that is “huh‽”

    March 2006

    March 2006 was a much more liberalized time.

    you just don’t find these kinds of firebrand figures anywhere in the mainstream

    well yeah, because there are no mainstream politics in china that are not local. instead, they do non–party-threatening punditry. i’m talking people like zhang xuefeng and yuan tengfei (note that despite impressions some outdated reports might give, zhang xuefeng was only temporarily suspended, which well carlson has been too.), or hardcore hardcore domestic tankies like guyanmuchan.

  • that’s politicians. politicians do get relatively long sentences for corruption in europe. there’s so many ways to abuse workers besides bribery

    and in any case, none of the executions have been for bribery that caused neglect to workers’ rights or safety collapses as you calimed. the most i’ve found for these cases is 15 years and merely expelling for Yang Dongliang—whose neglect caused 173 deaths, 798 injuries, and nearly ¥7B of property damage in the horrific Tianjin explosions—not even anywhere close to a single life expectancy. the medicine Duilio Poggiolini took bribes to approve didn’t even kill anyone and he still served half of Yang’s sentence.

    the only tangential one was Zheng Xiaoyu, who state-approved medicine that in one instance caused “14 patient deaths, hundreds being permanently disabled, and several thousand more falling seriously ill”, which has no comparable case in europe with a similar impact per-capita.

    China at a local level is incredibly directly democratic

    i actually agree with that. but the local governments cannot override the system decided higher-up by democratic centralism.

  • not exactly. if you’re worried about the differences between bash 3 and 5, you’re probably using some intermediate bash-exclusive features because that’s the headlining changes between these versions (google says associative arrays and new shellvars. even if zsh has equivalent features, the syntax would be different.) it’s only “guaranteed” to run fine in both shells if the shebang ends in /sh to call the POSIX shell without any bash- or zsh- specific features.

    it isn’t available anywhere else

    i don’t get what @[email protected] means by this though