FartsWithAnAccent

Oh no. Guess I will continue to not go to that enshittified dumpster fire of a website.

Every time I read a headline, it’s even dumber than the last one I read. What the fuck?

“FUCK YOUR ENGINE, LOL!”

-EPA I guess

One step closer to Grey Goo?

I don’t smoke, but I am increasingly skeptical of a lot of these articles and “studies” that seem to have an agenda especially when there’s a lot of money from alcohol and pharmaceutical companies going into manipulating public perception.

Personally, I’d much rather have a bunch of stoners in society than a bunch of alcoholics: I’ve never had to deal with a violent stoner because they smoked too much pot.

Glad I turned that shit off right away.

TOU doesn’t supercede law, but this lawsuit is probably bogus anyhow (then again UK can have some crazy laws and their judicial system is weird).

They’re probably going after Valve because they have more money.

I guess differentiating between correlation and causation would be a good start but that whole “improving social conditions” thing sounds promising too.

Maybe people who suffer from these things are more likely to use cannabis for relief rather than the other way around.

Finally leaving club pedo? Little late…

Let’s stop all this data theft right now then, yes? For all AI?

Law? Order?

Pretty much!

Yeah, they’re trying to force VPNs to block shit: What are they doing about X? Fuck all.

Doesn’t mean they’re good at what they’re trying to do, but you can see where their priorities are based on their efforts.

Watching other people play sports is usually boring as hell to me, but I still hope the VPNs tell Spain to fuck off.

Also, it’s pretty telling how they get right on top of this super fast, but the literal Nazi propaganda and AI CSAM generation site X was met with, well let’s call it a lackadaisical response.

I ditched my old insurance company the instant I contacted them and got a broken “response” from an AI agent: Lemonade is now dead to me even though they were the cheapest last time I got quotes.

You really can make it illegal if there’s the political will to do so, but it’s a hot potato, so the likelihood of of the practice being formally reigned in is unlikely. You make fruit of the poisonous tree absolute and create laws that make illegal search or seizure kill investigations without the possibility of future charges for a given criminal act.

Obviously that would also have practical drawbacks as well, but it is certainly legally possible.

It definitely is a legally acceptable practice in the US, but I can’t speak to other countries.

Yes but that doesn’t answer the question of whether it’s an accepted practice in the EU. I’m also not so sure it isn’t somehow codified into law, in the US there’s precedents supporting it but IDK about other countries.