Iirc that custody issue was between the local and federal investigators. So it’s only relevant in the federal case.

With liberty and Justice proportional to your ability to pay.

But if you don’t have that information already how can you trust the information is correct?

So it makes more mistakes but catches slightly less mistakes? Sounds effective.

If a human provided that advice they would be in jail. I think there is some percentage of liability, and it’s up to the courts to decide how much.

Shame

Even if it’s not, someone could retroactively use the footage to follow your movements.

It definitely reminds me of a cave.

I’m not cinical, but this is likely the 4th or 5th time someone has made a 3 sided zipper in my lifetime.

Literally every type of age verification ever put into place has been circumvented by children. EVERY SINGLE ONE.

If you have anything else to add besides hyperbole now is the time. Otherwise I think we’re done here.

And what is the truth? You don’t get to define away all the bad parts of the technology and just point out the good parts. My life is materially worse because of how this technology is developing and being implemented. Some extremely vague wins aren’t enough to convince me to change my mind. I have heard your argument, I have measured it and found it wanting.

Just because you don’t like my points doesn’t mean I’m arguing in bad faith, and I find it a little insulting that you’re trying to dodge instead of responding to my point by insinuating I am.

Iron alloy doesn’t convince people they shouldn’t have their noose visible in case someone might see it and intervene. You’re not going to change my mind. Once the bubble is popped and all our lives get worse and 3 people control all the technology it’s not going to matter that it saves people time, or it creates efficiency.

All those things being true is enough for me to hate AI.

Edit: As my dad says, One aw shit wipes away a million attaboys.

Right! If you don’t count the mass surveillance boost, the autonomous killing machines they’re trying to make, the environmental impact, the pillaging of our individual experiences, and the destruction of all our shared spaces online, AI is a pretty cool tool.

But Google isn’t taking it down for any reason, they’re giving someone else the revenue for the young woman’s work.

No true scammer.

It’s entirely likely several teams of lawyers were waiting for this ruling to create precedent.

Someone’s a crayon eater and it’s not the marine for once. lol Dude is just looking for an argument.